Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Principal Stops Pledge of Allegiance

According to National Review:
Last week, Principal Pat Jones, worried that by the fact that some of his students didn’t know the federal government had been shut down, announced that his school, Alliance High School in Nebraska, would refrain from reciting the pledge as they did each morning, to remind them of the problems in Washington.

***

They only went without the recitation for a day; one woman said her son protested by standing to recite the Pledge anyway.

I give alot of credit to this principal for even attempting for one day to stop reciting "The Pledge".  Along with that thought I question just how much of a dweeb and pathetically propagandized a student must be to stand for the pledge of allegiance out of protest?

The School Revolution: A New Answer for Our Broken Education System




According to Mises.org these following selections are taken from Chapter 5 of Ron Paul's new book The School Revolution: A New Answer for Our Broken Education System.

This is why libertarians believe that there should be open entry into the field of education. They do not trust state bureaucrats to act on behalf of parents, especially parents who have a particular view of the best methodology and content for the education of their children. The bureaucrats operate in their own self-interest, which is to expand their power and income.

This raises the issue of government regulation of schools. First, the government requires compulsory attendance. Second, in order to keep control over the content of the curriculum, governments establish rules and regulations governing those schools. Parents are not allowed to send their children to schools that do not meet these qualifications. The qualifications are set very high, so that not many schools can be established to compete against the public school system. This increases the power of the public school system, and the power of the bureaucrats who run the system.

***

The goal of academic regulation is to limit the supply of schools that compete against public schools. This is done in the name of guaranteeing the educational quality of the school, thereby protecting the students. Yet the academic performance of the public schools continues to decline, and has done so since the early 1960s. The scores on the SAT and ACT exams continue to fall. The high point was in the early 1960s. So, regulation has not been successful in guaranteeing the quality of education. But it has been quite successful in restricting entry into the field of education.

***

The government does not have to burn books in order to persuade the next generation of voters of ideas that favor the government. The government need only screen out books and materials that are hostile to the expansion of the state.

Simple, yet profound.  

Sunday, October 13, 2013

A Board of Education on Long Island Silences Autistic Teen


According to Patch.com:

The Northport-East Northport Board of Education cut off a 14-year-old boy from speaking during Monday’s meeting when the teen, who has a form of high-functioning autism, attempted to express what he felt was unfair treatment in his classroom due to his disability.

Christian Ranieri held back tears as he left the room after being shut down just a few sentences into his speech, in which he was asking the board to hear him out after he felt he was unfairly suspended for two days from school. 

The school board president cited privacy laws in his reasoning for halting Ranieri's speech.

The article above goes in to great detail about the reason behind the students suspension and further in to what went on during the Board of Education meeting.  I implore you to read it if you want to understand the entire story.  I am refraining from quoting more of the article because I'd rather allow this blog to be an opinion piece...
Public Education is a disgrace.  It has become a complete failure in regards to actually educating children, history is being re-written and facts are being subjected to revision.  This is all common knowledge if you care to do some research.  However the one thing schools can try harder at is helping build the emotional stability of children regardless of state mandates and federal curriculum's.  

This is a perfect case though of how American schools are not here to help children, they are here to control and develop them in a specific manner dictated by bureaucrats from above. They are definitely not around to make them smarter or care more and absolutely not to allow them to be heard.  This poor kid who spent his entire life attempting to find his voice and over come his autism was shown first hand what public education and its over lords on Boards and Departments, and their minions the Superintendents and Principals, are really here to accomplish.  

The following is the full speech Renieri had prepared for the meeting, but was barred from reading:

My name is Christian Ranieri and I am a 9th Grader at Northport High School. You should know that I have a developmental disability called Autism.I have come a long way in life as I could not talk in the beginning but now I am able to express my message to you in words. When I was 5 I cried a lot and would throw myself on the floor when I got frustrated. I am proud to say that now I can speak clearly and to the best of my ability try to deal with my frustration in words.I feel like the decision made by the person at Northport High School to suspend me for 2 days was discriminatory on the part that I have Autism and the fact that she thought that what had happened was not a result of my Autism. This whole incident happened when I tried self-advocating for myself after my resource room teacher did not implement my IEP and Behavior Intervention Plan. The day before this alleged incident we had a meeting with my mom, my dad, my resource room teacher, the school psychologist, and my assistant principal. At this meeting I told them that my reward system had not been put in place and I had been in school for almost 1 month. Ever since the beginning of High school I have had to self-refer myself to the assistant principal's office because certain teachers would not allow me my accommodated seat on my IEP. In history there have been people who have had to fight for a seat. One that I know of and many of you might know of was named Rosa Parks. At that time, her civil rights did not afford her to sit in the front of a bus. As a result she was arrested for not giving up her seat.In my case my civil rights give me the opportunity to have a special seat because of my developmental disability and yet I find myself having to fight for it. My parents have explained that you are the ones who decide who manages my IEP, my accommodations, and my behavior intervention plan. The person you chose to do this for me did not do her job and has accused me of intimidating her!At the beginning of the school year I was excited to go to High School though my mom and dad were a bit nervous about how I would adjust and whether the staff would know how to handle me and my developmental disability. Every day I have a smile on my face because I am excited for a brand new day. Sometimes I can be hard to handle because my brain thinks differently but that does not mean I should be mistreated and dismissed by my teachers. Last May, I participated in my own meeting to describe what I needed to be a successful student at the High School and get my job done with the skills I have. Since then, the office of Developmental disabilities and its Self- Advocacy association has made me Youth Ambassador and has asked me to be a key note (sic) speaker in Albany at the end of October. It makes me very sad that I have come so far and now will have to talk about how my school does not support my plan to succeed. I have spent so much time outside of the classroom trying to explain my accommodations and my plan instead of in my class learning to pass my regents exams.During the meeting with the person who suspended me, I explained how I tried to talk to the teacher appropriately. I even asked to come outside in the hallway so that I would not disrupt the other students in the classroom. The person who suspended me said she was not aware of that but did not seem to care about what I was saying. She did not seem to care about my IEP or my Behavior Intervention plan and the fact that some teachers were not implementing it. She told me and my parents that at Northport High School what it means to respect adults as my disorder makes it hard for me to understand this I have an intellectual and developmental disability that affects my social thinking. All of this is on my IEP. My parents are always trying to come up with plans for me so that I understand when I should and should not obey adults. Especially, if it can put me in danger. Would all of this be happening to a student with Autism that doesn't speak?I feel that because I had to face many injustices, it is time for my voice to be heard. For example, in middle school one of my teachers did not let me use my netbook computer that is on my IEP for test corrections because he said that if I used it would be considered "cheating" so I spent over 2 days writing down the corrections even though I cannot really write well for a long period of time because of my issues, but if you give me my laptop I can get the job done! I want people to know that I deserve respect as much as they do. Not because I have a disability but because I am a human just like them.After I was suspended I began to cry and my parents decided to go straight to the Superintendent's office to talk about our situation. We were told she was in a meeting and my parents and I said we would wait for it to be over in the hallway. After a little while, of sitting outside in the hallway, I told my Mom that I felt like we were at a Sit In. Since I love history, I know all about Sit Ins and how they were used as a protest method. A few minutes later, a security man came to us and asked us to leave. So we did. That was last Monday. Up until today she has never met with us.I am asking you to investigate my situation and remove the suspension from my record as this suspension might ruin my future and I do not want to be seen as a trouble maker (sic). On Friday, during my resource room, one week after the alleged incident I saw the person who suspended me in the room talking with my teacher. I could not even look at her because I feel very angry about being suspended for self-advocating. How is it fair that I get punished and the teachers don't? Although my parents have told me that I must remain with the same resource room teacher until they can figure a way of getting me out of that classroom, I am here to ask you to please change my situation so I do not have to sit in a room with an adult who thinks that I intimidated her or that I am a trouble maker.I met with a psychologist at my home and during our conversation I realized that people needed to hear my story and that is why I decided to do this.The Self-Advocacy Association has taught me one very important thing and that is, "Nothing for me, without me." Thank you for listening to my story. 

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Transforming America’s Schools into Authoritarian Instruments of Compliance

These days, it is far too easy to rattle off the outrageous examples of zero tolerance policy run amok in our nation’s schools. A 14-year-old student arrested for texting in class. Three middle school aged boys in Florida thrown to the ground by police officers wielding rifles, who then arrested them for goofing off on the roof of the school. A 9-year-old boy suspended for allegedly pointing a toy at a classmate and saying “bang, bang.” Two 6-year-old students in Maryland suspended for using their fingers as imaginary guns in a schoolyard game of cops and robbers. A 17-year-old charged with a felony for keeping his tackle box in his car parked on school property, potentially derailing his chances of entering the Air Force.

Thus, it’s tempting, when hearing about the 7-year-old suspended for chewing his Pop-Tart into the shape of a gun to chalk it up to an isolated example of school officials lacking in common sense. However, as I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, these incidents are far from isolated. They are part of a concerted, top-down approach to creating a generation of obedient worker-bees content to be directed, distracted and kept in line.

Despite a general consensus that zero tolerance policies have failed to have any appreciable impact on student safety, schools have doubled down on these policies to the detriment of children all across the nation. Indeed, the zero tolerance mindset is so entrenched among school administrators all over America that we are now seeing school officials reaching into the personal lives of students to police their behavior at all times. For example, 13,000 students in the Glendale Unified School District in California are now being subjected to constant social media monitoring by school officials. Superintendent Richard Sheehan has hired private firm Geo Listening to analyze the public social media posts of students both off and on campus.

Unfortunately, the Glendale program is simply one component of a larger framework in which all student activity is treated as an open book by school administrators. What we are witnessing is a paradigm shift in American society, in which no personal activity is safe from the prying eyes of government agents and their corporate allies.

Government officials have worked hard to indoctrinate Americans into the belief that everything you do is suspect, and anything you do can be held against you at a later date. This mindset is clear in all aspects of society, from zero tolerance policies in our nation’s schools, to SWAT team raids in our neighborhoods. More and more people are becoming suspicious of others, quick to judge, and more than willing to follow the government’s dictates, however irrational and immoral they may be.

This manner of thinking has been slowly adopted by many Americans, but more worrisome is the manner in which it’s being foisted upon our nation’s youth. We are now living in an era in which childhood as it was once understood, a time to learn, to make mistakes, to try and fail, to try again and succeed, has been replaced by the worst elements of corporate and government culture. Children are treated as workers and prisoners, collected, corralled and controlled by teachers who increasingly act as bureaucrats, forced to fit every child into the exact same mold, regardless of their personal abilities and talents. This mindset is apparent among the proponents of the Common Core Testing Standards which threaten to unleash a new system of standardized testing on a new generation of kids.

As communications consultant Luba Vangelova has noted, the key attributes of a productive member of society are “a zest for life, creativity, perseverance, empathy, effective communication and the ability to cooperate with others. These are things that can’t be measured well – if at all – by tests.”

Psychologist Peter Gray takes this criticism further, noting that children today are rarely allowed the opportunity to engage in undirected creative activity, also known as playing. Gray notes that since the 1960s, time for play has taken a backseat in the lives of children in favor of rigid curriculums revolving around high-stakes testing. Even sports, which were once simply games played on the fly by a mixed group of neighborhood kids, have taken on the rigidity of life in a factory or cubicle.  The obsession with quantifying childhood progress has gone so far that charter schools in DC are beginning to conduct high stakes testing for three and four year old children.

Over the same time period, incidences of childhood mental illness have steadily increased. The number of children and young adults suffering from major depression and generalized anxiety disorder have increased between five and eightfold since the 1950s. The suicide rate for 15 – 24 year olds has doubled, while the suicide rate for those under the age of 15 has quadrupled.

The rise in these mental illnesses is coupled with a decrease in empathy and an increase in narcissism in young people, indicating that their ability to work with others — as is necessary in a society — has been muted. We’re raising a generation of anxious individuals who expect their life’s direction to come to them from orders from above. In short, we’re creating a generation ingrained with an authoritarian mindset.

This situation will only get worse as our children are taught to accept the police state as normal. Between the regimes of zero tolerance, the surveillance of students both in school and in their homes, and the value placed in standardized testing over teaching analytical thinking skills, we are raising a generation which is being encouraged to adopt the authoritarian mindset which pollutes the minds of our government and corporate leaders. By allowing our children to be subject to the forces of the market and the dictates of the state, we are ensuring tyranny within a generation or two, if not sooner.



Reprinted without permission by the Rutherford Institute.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Common Core Teaching Kids That The Bill of Rights is "Outdated"

According to Story Leak:

Sixth grade students from the Bryant School District in Arkansas were asked to throw out two amendments in the Bill of Rights as part of a Common Core history class assignment.
The worksheet reads:

“The government of the United States is currently revisiting The Bill of Rights. They have determined that it is outdated and may not remain in its current form any longer.”

***

The assignment also asks students to revise the Bill of Rights under a special “task force,” failing to mention the amendment process which includes support from a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate.

Just another reason I'm happy to be in Texas, one of the five states not to accept the Common Core Curriculum.  

Saturday, September 28, 2013

School Resource Officers put in Place to Indoctrinate Children


Resource officers are sworn law enforcement officers with the authority to make arrests and carry a weapon in schools.

According to RT:
The US Department of Justice has pledged $44mn in grants to provide 356 school resource officers to 141 cities and counties nationwide in what it calls an effort to make schools safer following events like the Newtown, Connecticut, shooting in December.

Grants intended to fund more police officers in schools will go to law enforcement agencies across the country, the Justice Department (DOJ) said Friday as it unveiled the entire list of recipients.

***

“Not only do they deter crime, but they provide opportunities for positive relations between students and law enforcement,” Karen Servas, a Modesto City School District grant writer who worked with the city police department to appeal for funding, told McClatchy.

... positive relations between students and law enforcement... let's take a better look at that idea with some recent interactions between students and "resources officers".
According to TechDirt:
The theft of a dollar shouldn’t have warranted much more than a visit to the principal’s office, if that. But, because of these policies, the school automatically turned it over to a state trooper, who then interrogated two children, presumably attempting to get the 8-year-old to testify against the fifth-grader. Unfortunately, incidents like these are far from rare.

- A water balloon fight towards the end of the school year results in seven students arrested.

- A high school student who changed another student’s last name to something inappropriate in the school yearbook is arrested and facing first degree property damage charges, a felony.

- A 14-year-old student is arrested on two charges of “disrupting the educational process” and one count of “obstructing an officer” after wearing an NRA shirt to class — something that did not violate the school dress code, which bans “depictions of violence” but not guns.

- In Mississippi, kids have been arrested (and incarcerated) for “dress code violations, flatulence, profanity and disrespect.”

- In Stockton, CA, a 5-year-old with ADHD had his hands and feet zip-tied by the on-duty officer while he waited for the parents to show up. The child was then charged with “battery on a police officer.”

- A cop who was not on duty at a Washington, DC school gave a 10-year-old student a concussion when he “grabbed the back of [the student's] head and slammed his head forward into the table.” The student had been sent to the cafeteria for not participating in music class.

- A diabetic student who fell asleep in class claims the school police officer slammed her face into a filing cabinet before arresting her and taking her to jail.

So these students sure are taking part in relations with these officers, just not very pleasant ones.  School children are being indoctrinated to believe that police officers should be everywhere to protect from anything.  That the only way to keep safe is to allow a thug in a costume to walk around the building with a gun.  

If some crazed lunatic wants to shoot up a school, one or two resource officers may help, or they may end up victims as well.  There is never any guarantee that just because a "good" guy with a gun is in the building that a "bad" guy that enters would be stopped by them.  

If you want to live in reality, with the very small chance of any given school actually being victim of a mass shooting, these officers are in place to victimize students, to get them ready for the police state that they are surely growing up to inherit.  

The RT article linked up top goes in to greater detail by stating:
The “school-to-prison pipeline” operates directly and indirectly, the ACLU writes in its research on punitive school discipline.
“Directly, schools send their students into the Pipeline through zero tolerance policies, and involving the police in minor discipline incidents. All too often school rules are enforced through metal detectors, pat-downs and frisks, arrests, and referrals to the juvenile justice system. And schools pressured to raise graduation and testing numbers can sometimes artificially achieve this by pushing out low-performing students into GED programs and the juvenile justice system.
“Indirectly, schools push students towards the criminal justice system by excluding them from the learning environment and isolating them from their peer groups through suspension, expulsion, ineffective retention policies, transfers, and high-stakes testing requirements.”
***
The National Association of School Resource Officers says there are more than 10,000 resource officers in the US, and that school-based policing is the fastest growing area of law enforcement in the nation.
I'll translate that last line in to what it really means, Cha-Ching.  The fastest growing area of law enforcement is making someone, somewhere alot of money.  They could care less about keeping kids safe, just like the private prison system could care less about rehabilitating inmates.  It's all about controlling the masses and taking their resources.  

Indoctrinate the kids and steal their parents money through an abusive and illegal taxation system.  How best to do that then to convince them that they need to add police officers to local schools?  Taxes will go up, kids will be treated like inmates and psychopaths will find another gun free zone to go on their rampage.  Or if they are that crazy, a resource officer is not going to stop them from committing their atrocity.  

Thursday, August 1, 2013

A Message to the Third World


I am an average American citizen.  This letter is to those citizens of the world who live in a place where Western Civilization has not completely taken over your original culture.  The most important thing I can say to you is to cherish every moment you have left.  I read something recently in regards to citizens of other nations striving to achieve what western societies have already accomplished and it boggled my mind.  

No one should strive to become part of a society that starts pre-emptive wars of aggression.  A society that takes nearly a third of all income from each of it's citizens just to pay for those wars.  A society who spies on itself for its own "safety", trusts their own neighbors as far as they can throw them, and openly admits to caring more about sports than politics.  

These people in third world nations actually want to be like us?!  They want to destroy the planet with gas guzzling automobiles and AC units in every window cill?  They want to care more about televised competitions than the health of their family?  They want to feed their children genetically modified "food"?  These citizens of third world nations actually seek to live in a society where the individual is demonized while mass hysteria and rioting is promoted by our so called leader?  

I should say ruler actually, because a leader leads by example and moves his followers to a better place.  A ruler tells you what to do while holding a gun to your head.  Our glorious rulers actively prompt certain demographics to riot in the street while rounding up other demographics for peacefully redressing their grievances.  Our secret police day in and day out preform SWAT and Joint Terrorism Task Force raids with military equipment to terrorize average law abiding citizens as well as those committing non violent, victimless crimes.  

Anyone who tells you America is free and prosperous or tries to claim that other nations are more brutal and treat their citizens with less respect is lying to you.  America is very unsafe, the police forces here are extremely likely to shoot and kill you at any point, and cities all over the nation are controlled by gangs.  Any citizen of a nation who has not yet been indoctrinated in to western civilization should fight tooth and nail to stay that way.  They should not be actively trying to accomplish the same way of life as those of us who live in "western nations".  

If you ask me, citizens of these nations have the greatest opportunity of all time.  They have the opportunity to create a new world order in a time when communication and technology are beyond our ancestors wildest dreams. To establish a new status quo as well as different ways of accomplishing old goals.  Do not follow the same road we as a nation and civilization have fallen victim to.  Try new ways of doing old things.  Support solar and wind power over coal and gas.  Support self governance over democracy.  Support  small scale farming over mass industrialization of food production.  Support money backed by an actual commodity rather than by thin air.  Support pretty much anything else other than what America and western civilization has actively proliferated over the entire planet.  

Either that, or we as a species are in for some very terrible times.  

Sincerely,
An Average American Citizen